It works amazingly well. I appreciate it very much.
Blog
-
my primary NAS (Synology DiskStation DS115j) had a high CPU usage, so I restarted it
I have been using it almost simultaneously from a couple of machines through AFS and NFS, so once access started slowing down, I thought, it’s better to have a look at it’s “Resource Monitor” – and yes, its CPU usage stayed above 95% for quite some minutes, so once I had my short term goal achieved, I restarted the box. Let’s see, how it will behave in the near future!
-
this is my November Chromecast day
Despite its disadvantages and shortcomings I do fancy this nice little device. “Watching” full albums (from YouTube) on a TV with a nice audio system attached – that’s rather good fun, I just want to tell you. Keeps me going with my donkey work.
-
2014 account statements, transactions, bills, … – dowloading, filing, renaming, … – my current donkey work
All these have account statements and bills from transactions with me, but they all have different interfaces to get at them – my wish for 2016: pls provide us with a unique interface for retrieving all these documents (but I doubt, we will be any closer to this in 2020):
- postbank.de
- amazon.de
- paypal.de
- oreilly.com – O’Reilly
- pragprog.com – Pragmatic Programmers
- telekom.de – Deutsche Telekom / “Festnetz”
- telekom.de – Deutsche Telekom / “Mobilfunk”
- vistaprint.de
- cyberport.de
- united-domains.de
- …
-
running a YouTube playlist through Chromecast or through HDMI cable
- using Chromecast absolutely looks neat
- but ProxFlow only applies within my browsers (Chrome, …), Chromecast talks to YouTube itself, not taking ProxFlow into account
-
“Yoobao Long March Capacity Power Bank” – looks like a nice and useful device
- http://www.meetup.com/Big-Data-Berlin/events/215366592/
- http://www.amazon.de/11000mAh-Yoobao-Capacity-iPhone-Mobile/dp/B00EA8IE60
Last night at the Big Data Berlin meetup I came across somebody with this nice “little” device – he powered his tablet computer with this device – he had it for quite a while, and he seemed rather satisfied. Costs like EUR 30 at Amazon. -
attended tonight: Big Data, Berlin v3.0
Thomas Bestfleisch (“Solution Engineer” at Exasol AG, Nürnberg) held a talk titled “A Tool for a Job“:
- https://www.xing.com/profile/Thomas_Bestfleisch
- the lawnmower pictures were “nice”, the analogy “impressive”
- the traditional DB systems are: Hadoop, MySQL, Postgres, Oracle
- the competitors “simply” extended these traditional DB systems
- some of them operate in main memory (“in core”), which is faster than operating on SSD, which is faster than operating on HD
- some of them use “columnar DBs” (i.e. time series …), which is more suitable than record oriented or special (distributed) file system based DB systems
- some of them added concurrency, Thomas stated – that sounds odd, as concurrency should be made use of simply “everywhere”, that’s so basic
- so far a proper though a little superficial introduction
- Thomas is rather clear to understand, though initially he was a little nervous, not keeping a constant close distance to the microphone, but moving back and forth instead
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_data – for a deeper dive into the topic
- Thomas’s final statement: EXASOL (the product) is better then the competition, and it is way ahead of the competition, but Thomas did not explain, how they achieve that – no technical details at all
Ronert Obst (“Data Scientist” at Pivotal.io) held a talk titled “Smart Cars of Tomorrow: Learning Driving Patterns From Sensor Data“:
- https://www.xing.com/profile/Ronert_Obst
- a box connected to the car creates a stream of JSON data
- they are collecting the data, do some statistical analysis, they create predictions
- their database system is also way ahead the market – that’s what he says, they think themselves
- also: no explanation of their technical details
- his live presentation with “data plotting” screw up because of technical problems, but being an experienced guy, he was able to present a video as plan b – the video was “a little long” (actually <3 min. in total), but he could have restricted the video to the essential part – well, you know how impatient we I.T. guys are
- Ronert is also rather clear to understand
- the project’s outcomes seem to get used by the U.S. insurance industry; they are getting at behavioural data of the drivers; drivers with such boxes and behaving well get better insurance tariffs; this is the U.S. – just image the massive information privacy violation for a minute!
Both speakers are German native speakers, both do not mumble at all, excellent to understand after all, both may be great conference speakers a couple of years ahead, maybe with “a little” intense English training through living in an English speaking country for a couple of years. Having “lots of” non-native English speakers around in their offices isn’t really the same. I am looking forward to see both their follow-ups on their topics (getting more into the details), because I really quite like their styles and their kindness.
Just in case you should wish to connect:
And you can obviously follow me:
- https://twitter.com/Jochen_Hayek
- http://Jochen.Hayek.name/wp/blog-en
- http://Jochen.Hayek.name/wp/blog-de
I hope, you agree I am treating the speakers fairly.
-
NFS UID mapping without NIS – how to achieve that? is NFS weaker there than AFS and Samba?
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_File_System = NFS
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_Information_Service = NIS
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_File_System = AFS (Mac OS X)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIFS AKA SMB AKA Samba
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_security#Root_squash – re “root=…”
- http://linux.die.net/man/5/exports – /etc/exports
My (reduced) I.T. landscape:
- a Synology DiskStation NAS (with some Linux and “Busybox”) functions as an NFS server
- an openSUSE Linux VM is the relevant NFS client – the other clients don’t use NFS but AFS (for the Macs) and Samba (…)
True, I am not using NIS.
True, my server and my client don’t have the same values for corresponding users (UIDs). Should I better “chown -R …” the respective users’ directory trees on the NAS in order to achieve the proper UID mapping?!?
My NFS server does not accept “root=…”.
Is making brute force use of “anonuid=…” on the server side (mapping all accesses from outside to a single user w/o further proper authentication) the only (and admittedly unappropriate) way to achieve my goal then? Yes, I do have an idea of what anonuid should be used for.
AFS and Samba seem to be able to deal with user accounts, that do not have the same UIDs on both sides – how to deal with that in the NFS context w/o NIS?!?
Update 2015-01-26: Simply use the relevant NAS users’ UIDs also on the NFS clients. Get rid of all explicit UID squashing and mapping.

