I found this message today in my telnet session on my FRITZ!Box:
Nov 26 10:16:25 dsld[2178]: internet: Bonk Attack detected (1)
I think, this I saw this already a couple of months ago, and I think, the box rebooted then, but it didn’t do that no.
Blog
-
an alert on my FRITZ!Box 7390: “internet: Bonk Attack detected”
-
Adium, the free instant messaging application for Mac OS X
It’s based on libpurple, and it can also deal with Skype and OKCUPID instant messaging.
-
entering XML or literal HTML in the Blogger article editor is a PITA
At least the “<" you have to enter as "<", which makes it rather unreadable. If you forget this, and enter tags, as you want to see them displayed, they simply get removed. Bad and sad!
-
DocBook: article.info.date … – why does date not get displayed?
Good question, isn’t it? No, it’s not a good question, I assume. Using here is apparently just not the right way (I assume). Why?
I have used this combination for quite some time now.
I have no idea, whether I ever convinced myself, whether … gets displayed.
Just today I wondered, why it doesn’t get displayed.
I went through the pain of searching the DocBook XSL documentation, and XSL files, and … .This is the file, that actually showed me, how I should do it and that I should use … instead:
…/html/titlepage.templates.xml
Whatever it makes you feel like, if you look at this file (it really shows me, how little I understand of all this, so I feel desperate), it clearly lists the tags, that are taken into account for constructing the article info, and it doesn’t include but , so simply go and use in your DocBook article and stop crying!
I am really not sure, it was always like that, but that’s the way it is now.
So what do we learn from this lesson?
Editing a DocBook file in emacs’ nxml-mode does present you the entire list of syntactically acceptable tags. But that doesn’t mean all these tags are being made use of by the stylesheets.
So either you always construct your DocBook files from the nice samples in TDG, or you keep verifying your files against the template files like the one quoted above, or …
-
my XML catalog had a prefer=”public” attribute
How did it slip in there? I can’t really say. All I can say is, that it got included with an entry for Apples’s PropertyList DTD. But how did I know then, there is such an attribute with such a value?
I removed it now, actually I put it inside an XML comment together with some words explaining my confusion. In case this action now will break any processing in the future, I hope, I will find this blog article then.