Category: PuTTY

  • emacs/tramp/win/putty: what versions to choose in March/April 2014

    After completing my recent “incident article” on emacs/tramp/win/putty [link], I thought I should prepare an article with a clear subject resp. statement. This is it.

    I sort of think resp. hope, that all currently released versions work together well. But PuTTY-0.63 breaks this expectation.

    • “Windows 7 Professional” is set – because that’s the current company standard
    • http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/windows/ – the latest released version was fine for me: 24.3.1 – I am always happy to get and try the very latest released version
    • tramp – as packaged with the emacs at the location just referred to
    • PuTTY to be found at http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/download.html
    • PuTTY-0.63 faults (for me) with accesses like this one: “/pscp:SESSIONNAME:…”
    • PuTTY’s development snapshot does not fault for me, as 0.63 does – r10156 is, what I picked up – I am happy to try newer ones, if asked to, and I would rather prefer a released version to be honest

    A released version is always easier to get installed officially, should I get the necessary privileges withdrawn to “install” resp. unpack packages myself. My privileges are good enough to put files “permanently” on the local disk, but not to “install” applications Windows-wise.

  • emacs/tramp/win/putty: one of the pieces involved kept removing Unix file permissions — solved!

    Unix: PSCP and PSFTP now preserve the Unix file permissions, on copies in both directions.

    For quite a while whenever I edited a remote executable file (using emacs/tramp/putty on Windows), the file lost its executable privilige bit. Looks like that issue got solved with 0.63. What a relief! The very arrogant meritocrat at work kept criticizing me for using “such poor software“, and he referred to emacs(/tramp).

  • I find “putty.org” a little suspicious

  • emacs/tramp/win/putty: “Fatal: Received unexpected end-of-file from server”

    Short story – what (released) versions to choose:

    The combination emacs/tramp/putty on Windows does not work with the released PuTTY-0.63. Use either PuTTY-0.62 or a PuTTY development snapshot, r10016 works for me.

    • http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/windows/ – the latest released version was fine for me: 24.3.1 – I am always happy to get the very latest released version
    • tramp – as packaged with the emacs at the location just referred to
    • PuTTY to be found at http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/download.html
    • PuTTY-0.63 faults with accesses as shown below
    • PuTTY’s development snapshot does not fault for me, as 0.63 does – r10156 is, what I picked up – I am happy to try newer ones, if asked to
    • Windows 7 Professional – because that’s the current company standard

    Long story:

    After the Windows upgrade at work (WinXP->Win7) I certainly installed the newest available emacs (i.e. emacs package) and PuTTY (0.63) as well.

    Current issue: On opening a file accessed through “/pscp:SESSIONNAME:”, I keep getting this message:

    Fatal: Received unexpected end-of-file from server

    I tried the “/plink:SESSIONNAME:” tramp access instead, and it worked (I mean: it didn’t yield this message), but the combination tramp/plink keeps leading to corrupted (remote) files, as I described before [link], so that’s not really an option.

    S.K.R. de Jong wrote [link], that the quoted message stems from an improper reaction of PuTTY, and Simon Tatham conceded the bug [link], writing the bug would be fixed with r10016.

    Because I  found Simon’s statement and announcement only during my later investigations, I decided to give the older PuTTY-0.62 a try, and this problem actually disappeared. Of course I love leading / bleeding edge, but right now this seems to stand in my way. So I will have to post the scenario on some PuTTY forum / mailing list, but until that will lead to an improvement here, I shall stick to PuTTY-0.62.

    When I had found Simon Tatham statement on this issue [link], I drew new hope, that a more modern version of PuTTY addressing the latest security issues  would also solve my problem – so I am giving the current development snapshot (to be found here) a chance, i.e. “r10156”. Actually I have never been eager to employ a development snapshot of PuTTY, so that is my “first“. I subscribed for the PuTTY-announce mailing list, so I shall be able to replace the development snapshot by a properly released one.

    If that will not successful:

  • Wednesday afternoon / evening is my time scheduled for extended technical read-ups

    But once again serious issues at work were in my way.
    This time my work PC’s WinXP->Win7 migration was the issue. emacs/tramp/putty in its newest (released) versions still did not want to work together as neatly as before. I will have to make use of putty-0.62 instead of 0.63, but the differences do not seem to hurt me right now. I do have a proper work set-up again (after like 3 days with lots of interrupts), but in the meantime (apart from some real work) I also improved a few issues with wiki articles and described a few Win7 migration related issues, that may serve a few colleagues quite well.

  • startup PuTTY’s authentication agent “Pageant” with private keys

    PuTTY’s authentication agent pageant combines the functionality of ssh-agent and ssh-add, and if you start it up, it makes sense to add the necessary private keys on its command line. You can do this using a script, but in Windows it’s convenient to does this through a “.lnk” shortcut. And if you place that “.lnk” file in Windows’ user startup directory, you won’t forget to start it manually.

    Here is a nice description of how to make “… Pageant automatically load keys on startup“:

    Basically:

    Recipe (Win <10):

    • within your Windows auto-start-up folder (Start > All Programs > Startup — right-click > Open) …
    • create a Windows “shortcut” to Pageant.exe, it gets called pageant.exe.lnk!
    • edit the shortcut’s properties!
    • tell the command line, where to “Start in:“! %USERPROFILE%\AppData\Roaming\putty or %USERPROFILE%\etc\putty (that’s where you created resp. left your private keys using PuTTYgen)
    • add the private keys on the command line within “Target:” (YOUR.ppk)– and the paths may be relative to the directory you mentioned in “Start in:

    Recipe (…):

    • %USERPROFILE%/AppData/Roaming/Microsoft/Windows/Start Menu/Programs/Startup/ : Pageant.lnk

    It’s helpful to dump the details of pageant.exe.lnk using one of these nice tools:

    PuTTY’s authentication agent “Pageant” has its counterparts in: ssinf h-agent + ssh-add

  • emacs/tramp/win/putty: “byte-code: couldn’t find a proper ‘ls’ command”

    The PC at “my” desk at my customer’s site just got migrated from WinXP to win7, and I have to re-install and re-configure a couple of packages, and now I have trouble re-adopting tramp.

    Having to deal with tramp always brings Michael Albinus to my mind. I only met him during one week in 1988 (1989?), when I had only lived for a couple of months in Berlin. It was quite an enthusiastic time then, and we were so much younger then. Would he let me invite him on a couple of glasses of rather drinkable red wine in the future back home in Berlin?

    Alright, back to the issue itself! Yes, after the Windows upgrade I certainly installed the newest available emacs (i.e. emacs package) and PuTTY (0.63) as well.

    • byte-compile …/emacs/lisp/net/tramp-sh.el
    • exit emacs
    • remove ~/.emacs.d/tramp, i.e. the “tramp connection history” resp. the “tramp connection details cache
    • start emacs

    and it seemed to find a proper “ls” command again.

    I.e. I didn’t follow the other advise, demanding the installation of the newest tramp package.

    Having solved the “ls” issue, I faced these messages:

    Unable to use key file "…id_rsa.ppk" (unable to open file)
    Fatal: Received unexpected end-of-file from server

    The windows registry had a couple of entries named “PublicKeyFile” pointing to an outdated location, where id_rsa.ppk had resided before. Changed all occurrences of that entry within the registry (subtree of PuTTY), and that issue was solved.

  • emacs/tramp/win/putty: “File exists, but cannot be read”

    I had a look here and look there for hours, … – accidentally I looked into the *Messages* buffer and found, that some file access within c:windowstemp failed. The system variables TEMP and TMP are initialized with c:windowstemp, but I have no rights to look into c:windowstemp. Alright, system variables can get overridden. And they actually were overridden. I just changed that to something very, very simple: c:temp. I restarted emacs, and everything was alright again.

  • if saving a file through “tramp” is not successful, ending “PLINK.EXE” may be a solution

    PLINK.EXE is part of the PuTTY family, and it’s the utility tramp is communicating through.

    “Burying” the respective tramp buffer in emacs is another one.

    Update 2016-02-09:

    Actually burying the tramp buffer in question is my 1st approach on all platforms (Linux/Mac/Windows), whenever tramp communication seems to be stuck. Afterwards (with a “clean new start”) everything is fine again in like 99% of the respective the cases.

  • Emacs and VC AKA Version Control and an excessive list of handled backends

    I am working for a customer

    • on WinXP
    • with GNU Emacs 24.2.1
    • through Tramp
    • resp. putty plink (“pscp”)
    • on AIX files.

    They are using CVS on AIX, but as I am actually the only Emacs user there, I don’t really bother going through the set-up for using Emacs with CVS on WinXP.

    Recently I looked into *tramp/pscp HOSTNAME*, and I decided I would be able cutting down on my waiting time, if I drastically reduced the list of files and directories being checked through VC in that environment.

    I really don’t mind the VC overhead on OS X or (SUSE) Linux, but in that difficult environment I rather want to proceed as described.

    I found vc-handled-backends and customised it the Emacs way, and I was done.